The Architecture of Intent
A Critical Lexicon
This collection of studies is the intellectual architecture of Post-Luxury Conceptual Functional Art (PLCFA).
The true artistry of this Maison resides not in the finished form, but in the rigorous thinking that precedes it. These essays serve as the conceptual foundation for PLCFA, using a critical lens to interrogate cultural phenomena, art history, and consumer paradigms—analyzing everything from the ephemeral spectacle of luxury to the pure architectural rigor of abstract principles.
This is an invitation into the workshop of the mind. By sharing this process, we validate the necessity of a new category of value and invite you toward a well-considered life, one founded on true craft, uncompromising narrative, and durable meaning.
New to PLCFA? Begin with Essential Reading below.
Exploring a specific area? Navigate by category.
The Simulacrum of the Copy: Aritzia's 'Dupe' Trademark and the Legalization of Hyperreality in Global Fashion IP
The fashion industry has officially entered the hyperreal condition. Aritzia's aggressive move to trademark the phrase "Aritzia Dupe" is not a defense of its physical product, but an empirical, legal attempt to control the very language of imitation. This effort seeks to regulate the generated "real" that has emerged from digital discourse, where consumers openly celebrate the dupe as a "smart choice" that strips away exchange-value while retaining symbolic prestige. By appropriating the signifier of the copy, the brand effectively elevates the simulated item to a position of market authenticity, making the imitation the only legible truth about the product in the contemporary marketplace.
This legal maneuver fundamentally validates the critique outlined by Jean Baudrillard: the capacity to distinguish between the original and its representation has collapsed entirely. The brand has abandoned the traditional mandate to defend the material object, choosing instead to secure a proprietary claim over the imitation's signifier. This is the definitive endpoint of the Simulacrum—a structural acknowledgment that the economic and cultural significance of the copy now outweighs the material integrity of the original, forcing the legal system to affirm that the sign of the copy is a primary, source-identifying feature of the luxury brand.
The "Monopoly on a Vibe": Why the Louis Vuitton vs. Coogi Lawsuit is the Final Collapse of Luxury's Sign System
The Louis Vuitton vs. Coogi lawsuit isn't just about a colorful sweater. It is a legal and semiotic crisis that exposes the central contradiction of the entire luxury system. This study dissects the case as a high-stakes battle for the ownership of an abstract "vibe" that has become fully detached from any object. We explore the profound irony: Louis Vuitton, an empire built on the aggressive legal monopoly of its own sign (the Monogram), is now forced to argue in federal court against the very idea of protecting an aesthetic.
Drawing on Baudrillard's theory of hyperreality, this analysis frames the lawsuit as the 'end game'—the moment the system of sign-value, from Coogi's '90s hip-hop adoption to Pharrell Williams's new curatorial role, finally collapses under the weight of its own logic. This is not a battle between a real product and a copy; it's a war between two simulations, where the physical object is irrelevant. The only territory left to fight over is the simulation itself.